due care

Fourth Circuit Affirms Ashley Rulings

The United States Court of Appeals finally issued its much anticipated ruling in PCS Nitrogen v Ashley II of Charleston, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 6815 (4th Cir. 4/4/13) last week. However, the wait turned out to be much ado about nothing. The court affirmed the district court rulings but did not clarify perhaps the most […]

Fourth Circuit Affirms Ashley Rulings Read More »

4th Circuit Hears Oral Argument on Ashley II Case

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit heard oral argument in early December on the appeal of the Ashley II of Charleston v PCS Nitrogen decision, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104772 (D.S.C. 9/20/10).  The case involves a 43-acre Columbia Nitrogen Superfund Site in the Upper Peninsula area of Charleston, South Carolina. The

4th Circuit Hears Oral Argument on Ashley II Case Read More »

Owner Incurs $1MM On Cleanup But Ct Says No “Due Care”-Owner Waited Too Long to Act

The second our series of recent cases involving the due care element of the CERCLA third party defense is State of New York v Adamowicz, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102988 (E.D.N.Y. 9/13/11) where a property owner was unable to establish that it exercised due care despite spending over $1MM addressing environmental concerns at its site.

Owner Incurs $1MM On Cleanup But Ct Says No “Due Care”-Owner Waited Too Long to Act Read More »

Review of Recent CERCLA Third Party Defense “Due Care” Caselaw-Part 1

The Third Party defense (42 U.S.C. 9607(b)(3) is probably the most important CERCLA defense. To assert the defense, a defendant must satisfy the following four elements or prongs: The release was solely caused by a third party; The defendant had no direct or indirect “contractual relationship” with the third party (“contractual relationship” prong); The defendant

Review of Recent CERCLA Third Party Defense “Due Care” Caselaw-Part 1 Read More »

Confusion Over Scope And Timing of RCRA Cleanup Leads to Potential Liability for Brownfield Developer

Last year, the brownfield community was rattled by the Ashley II decision of United States District court for the District of South Carolina holding that a brownfield developer failed to comply with the requirements of the Bona Fide Prospective Purchaser defense. The court ruled the developer did not comply with its post-closing continuing care obligations

Confusion Over Scope And Timing of RCRA Cleanup Leads to Potential Liability for Brownfield Developer Read More »

Scroll to Top