cost recovery

Ct Grants Summary Judgment in Maryland Square Vapor Intrusion Case

We have been periodically posting updates on the progress of the landmark Voggenthaler v Maryland Square, LLC vapor intrusion case from Las Vegas, Nevada.  In the most recent ruling, the court granted the motion for summary judgment filed by the Nevada Department of Environmental Protection (NDEP) seeking cost recovery under CERCLA.  2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS […]

Ct Grants Summary Judgment in Maryland Square Vapor Intrusion Case Read More »

Failure To Timely Report Release Raises Triable Issue Sufficient to Preclude Summary Judgment

Ameripride Services. v. Valley Indus. Services, 2011U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55634 (E.D.Ca. 5/12/11) discussed how delays or failure to comply with CERCLA reporting requirements may impact a claim for contribution or cost recovery. In this case, Texas Eastern Overseas, Inc (TEO) conducted industrial dry cleaning at a facility until 1983 when it sold the property to

Failure To Timely Report Release Raises Triable Issue Sufficient to Preclude Summary Judgment Read More »

No Arranger Liability For Migration of Contaminated Groundwater

Hobart Corp v Waste Management of Ohio, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148224 (S.D.Ohio 2/10/11) is an obscure decision from 2011 but has some complaint drafting lessons. This case started off as a classic CERCLA contribution action for a landfill cleanup. The plaintiff entered into a settlement with EPA to perform an RI/FS and then decides

No Arranger Liability For Migration of Contaminated Groundwater Read More »

Acquisitions Bring CERCLA Liability to Banking Conglomerate

From a purely legal standpoint, the recent ruling In Tennessee v. Roane Holdings Ltd., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 143703 (E.D.TN 12/14/11) was not unusual. The court ruled on a motion to dismiss that a party who had entered into an administrative order on consent could not bring a cost recovery action under CERCLA section 107

Acquisitions Bring CERCLA Liability to Banking Conglomerate Read More »

Federal Ct Says NY Waited Too Long to File Cost Recovery

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York dismissed a cost recovery action filed by the State of New York because the state waited too long to file its complaint. The outcome hinged on whether construction of wellhead treatment constituted a remedial action or removal action. This case is significant because New York

Federal Ct Says NY Waited Too Long to File Cost Recovery Read More »

Scroll to Top